A core reason (among several) why businesses - especially large ones - continue to support employer-provided health care coverage is due to the MASSIVE tax advantages it provides both the business and the employee. The value of Ted Cruz' health care benefits is tagged at $20,000 - a sizable amount not included in his wife's taxable income. And Goldman~Sachs gets to take it, in part or in whole (not sure which), as a business expense write-off. Win for the employer, win for the employee. NOT a win for the U.S. taxpayer.
In 2013 alone, it's estimated the U.S. Treasury will be out $248 BILLION ($240,000,000.00) dollars in health care benefits-related lost income & payroll taxes (a whopping 1.5% of the GDP, or more than the government pays for the interest on the federal debt).
I thank my friend for stating that tax-payers don't take a financial hit from employer-provided health care benefits. Would that it was true.